Natural Theology in the 21st Century, 2021 IRC Conference
"NATURAL THEOLOGY IN THE 21st CENTURY"
Oxford, 15-17 July 2021
With generous support from the Issachar Fund
This event, which was originally scheduled for 16-18 July 2020, was run as an online event in 2021 given the ongoing pandemic. The next scheduled physical IRC conference is the 2022 Conference, planned for Thursday evening 14 July to Saturday evening 16 July 2022. The theme will be the work of Alister McGrath, who will be retiring as the Andreas Idreos Chair of Science and Religion in summer 2022.
FREE PDF OF CONFERENCE HANDBOOK:
> 2021 IRC Conference Handbook (updated)
Thursday 15 July (evening only)
All these events will be online via Zoom
6:30pm |
Zoom meeting open |
7:30pm |
PLENARY PUBLIC LECTURE Iain McGilchrist (University of Oxford) |
9:00pm |
Finish |
Friday 16 July
All these events will be online via Zoom
8:45am |
Zoom meeting open |
|
||||||||||
9:00am |
PLENARY LECTURE Olivera Petrovich (Oxford Neuroscience, The Naturalness of Natural Theology: |
|
||||||||||
10:30am |
Break |
|
||||||||||
11:00am |
PARALLEL SHORT PAPERS I (THREE STREAMS) |
|
||||||||||
|
STREAM A |
|
||||||||||
11:00am |
An Evaluation of The Impact of Gene-Editing Tools on Natural Theology |
Bleacher, Jonathan |
|
|||||||||
11:30am |
Cognitive Science of Religion: |
de Smedt, |
|
|||||||||
12:00pm |
The Significance of the Oneiric for Natural Theology |
Deman, |
|
|||||||||
12:30pm |
A Convergence of Minds: |
Hart, |
|
|||||||||
|
STREAM B |
|
||||||||||
11:00am |
“If Evil exists, God Exists”: |
Echavarría, Agustín |
|
|||||||||
11:30am |
Fine-Tuning and Design: A Step Back to More Fundamental Considerations |
Hamri, |
|
|||||||||
12:00pm |
Modal Status and A Posteriori Arguments for God’s Existence |
Kremers, |
|
|||||||||
12:30pm |
The Kalam Cosmological Argument for the Existence of God: |
Loke, |
|
|||||||||
|
STREAM C |
|
||||||||||
11:00am |
Does Reichenbachian Meta-induction Justify Induction – |
Pitts, |
|
|||||||||
11:30am |
Why Natural Theology need not be Rational in order to be Reasonable |
Premkumar, Finney |
|
|||||||||
12:00pm |
Ungodly Nature: |
Sweeney, Matthew |
|
|||||||||
12:30pm |
How to Read the Book of Nature: Maximus’ Book of Nature and Methodology in the Theology-Science Dialogue |
Torrance, Eugenia |
|
|||||||||
1:00pm |
Lunch Break |
|
||||||||||
1:30pm |
PARALLEL SHORT PAPERS II (THREE STREAMS) |
|
||||||||||
|
STREAM A |
|
||||||||||
1:30pm |
CSR Exacerbates the Problem of Divine Hiddenness |
Bennett, Christopher |
|
|||||||||
2:00pm |
Perseverance in Faith. Can the Mars Rover Help Us Find a Further Dimension to Natural Theology? |
Kirby, |
|
|||||||||
2:30pm |
Defending the Value of the Biological Design Evidence for Future Natural Theology |
Kojonen, |
|
|||||||||
3:00pm |
The Possibility of a Scientific Morality within a Natural Theology |
Kumarasingham, |
|
|||||||||
|
STREAM B |
|
||||||||||
1:30pm |
The Probability of Desire: A Bayesian Exploration of C.S. Lewis’ ‘Argument from Desire’ |
Simek, |
|
|||||||||
2:00pm |
About useful and useless meanings of causality, purpose and order to support God´s existence arguments based on scientific perspectives |
Velázquez Fernández, Hector |
|
|||||||||
2:30pm |
The Ambiguity Argument for Agnosticism and the View From Nowhere in Natural Theology |
Wilczewska, Sylwia |
|
|||||||||
3:00pm |
God, Nature, Reason and Experience |
Younis, |
|
|||||||||
|
STREAM C |
|||||||||||
1:30pm |
Remembering the Jews, Expunging the Queers: Natural Law in the Wake of Auschwitz |
Benson, |
|
|||||||||
2:00pm |
Storyteller God: The Postmodern Natural Theology of George MacDonald |
Evans, |
|
|||||||||
2:30pm |
Miracles and Necessitarian |
Fatona, |
|
|||||||||
3:00pm |
The Possibility of Natural Theology in a World of Horrendous Evils |
Ooi, |
|
|||||||||
3:30pm |
Break |
|
||||||||||
4:00pm |
PLENARY LECTURE Helen de Cruz (St Louis University) A Taste for the Infinite: |
|
||||||||||
5:30pm |
Finish |
|
Saturday 17 July
10:45am |
Zoom meeting open |
|
||||||
11:00am |
PARALLEL SHORT PAPERS III (THREE STREAMS) |
|
||||||
|
STREAM A |
|
||||||
11:00am |
Quantum Mechanics and Salvation: |
Qureshi-Hurst, Emily |
|
|||||
11:30am |
The Distorting Natural (a)Theology of The Selfish Gene |
Skogholt, Christoffer |
||||||
12:00pm |
Evolution and the Applicability of Mathematics in Contemporary Physics |
Stokes, Mitch |
||||||
12:30pm |
Computational Theology and |
Vestrucci, Andrea |
||||||
|
STREAM B |
|
||||||
11:00am |
Semi-Reformed Natural Theology |
Guillon, Jean-Baptiste |
|
|||||
11:30am |
The Not-So-New Natural Theologies? The Need for Historical Perspectives on Natural Theology in the Modern Age |
Klaeren, George |
||||||
12:00pm |
Substantial Form and Actus Essendi. Avenues and Obstacles on the Way from Philosophy of Science to |
Lazzari, Edmund |
||||||
12:30pm |
Augmented Reality and Theology: A New Analogy for an “Integral” Expansion |
Martini, Alessandro |
||||||
|
STREAM C |
|||||||
11:00am |
“Teacher of Perfect Wisdom”. Calvin’s Pneumatological Natural Theology |
Butler, Geoffrey |
|
|||||
11:30am |
Revealing by Concealing: Revelation in Nature, Divine Hiddenness, and Religious Imagination | Juurikkala, Oskari |
||||||
12:00pm |
Irreducible Agent and its role in |
Shahinnia, Niloofar |
||||||
12:30pm |
|
SPARE |
||||||
1:00pm |
Lunch Break |
|
||||||
1:30pm |
PLENARY LECTURE Alister McGrath (University of Oxford) Natural Theology: |
|
||||||
3:00pm |
Conference ends |
|
Further information on the conference themes:
Natural theology investigates what we can know or not know about the existence and essence of God and divine revelation on the basis of what we can know about nature. Developments and discoveries in our explorations of nature (e.g., Aristotelianism, Copernican revolution, Newtonian physics, Kant’s Critique, Darwinian Evolution, quantum mechanics, and Big Bang cosmology) have enriched and challenged the investigations of natural theology throughout its history. Likewise, discoveries and revolutions in our understanding of nature in the 21stcentury (e.g., AI, Extended Evolutionary Synthesis, fundamental physics, etc.) will have the potential to undermine or enrich future investigations in natural theology. What questions will natural theology need to confront in the 21st century? How can these insights enrich the engagement of religious communities, such as Christian churches, with the wider culture?
Looking backward, what lessons do the future enquiries of natural theology need to learn from its past enquiries? What are the enduring achievements, catastrophic failures, and tangential distractions from the history of natural theology? What place will cosmological, ontological, design, moral, and other arguments for God’s existence have in its future investigations? What were the major contributions of the past hundred years of honorary lectures confronting questions in natural theology (e.g., Gifford, Hulsean, Bampton lectures) Looking forward, what challenges from philosophy and the sciences must natural theology confront, from numerous forms of naturalism, to metaphysics of dispositions and grounding, second-person perspective, machine learning, CRISPR, …? Are “nature” and the “natural” still viable concepts for 21st century enquiries, including those of natural theology?
What is or should be the scope of natural theology? Is it strictly concerned with evidence and arguments based in nature known apart from appeals to revelation or numinous experiences? Or, should it be construed broadly to include investigations concerning historical events, including those detailed in sacred and religious texts? What is the relationship between natural theology and the investigations of supernatural theology, philosophy of religion, analytic theology, theology of nature, and apologetics? Is natural theology “natural”? Is the very project of natural theology guilty of the charge of ontotheology? What place should metaphor and analogy have in natural theology? What role do narrative arguments, just-so stories, genealogies, and meta-narratives play in theists’, atheists’, and agnostics’ contributions to natural theology? Can anyone—theist, agnostic, or atheist—engage the enquiries of natural theology or atheology from a neutral point of view? How might these questions be engaged by religious communities seeking to engage a wider culture and cultivate the reasoned faith of their members?